Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 01/05/2010 - 20:48.
nice blog Andy ... although would have loved it even more if it had a little less sprinkling of "words to be used" references ...
absolutely agree to 2 bouncer rule .. as well instead of reducing the power play duration, i think some changes can be done in other rules to bring in parity ...like its not a wide if the batsman moves in his crease or increase the width for leg side wide... maybe even say a batsman is out if caught on no ball ... only thins is he cannot be bowled out on no ball ?
well bowlers should not have restrictions on bouncers esp in test matches ... or can we bring in a rule in test matches that a batsman cannot leave the ball more than 3 times in a over ?
yeah india did win ... but it would be difficult to call it a emphatic or convincin series victory ... esp the fieldin was appauling ...
good goin
nice blog Andy ... although would have loved it even more if it had a little less sprinkling of "words to be used" references ...
absolutely agree to 2 bouncer rule .. as well instead of reducing the power play duration, i think some changes can be done in other rules to bring in parity ...like its not a wide if the batsman moves in his crease or increase the width for leg side wide... maybe even say a batsman is out if caught on no ball ... only thins is he cannot be bowled out on no ball ?
well bowlers should not have restrictions on bouncers esp in test matches ... or can we bring in a rule in test matches that a batsman cannot leave the ball more than 3 times in a over ?
yeah india did win ... but it would be difficult to call it a emphatic or convincin series victory ... esp the fieldin was appauling ...
Shylender